Is SBproxy a reverse proxy, an AI gateway, or a model server?

All three, from one binary. It terminates TLS and handles HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, WebSocket, and gRPC like nginx or Envoy. It routes LLM traffic to 200+ hosted models across 72 providers with guardrails, budgets, and MCP federation. And it serves open-weight models on your own GPUs by supervising vLLM or llama.cpp underneath. One config file drives all of it, and the AI features sit on a runtime that was already a production-grade proxy.

SBproxy is the open-source enterprise gateway for API, MCP, and AI model traffic. Outbound, it routes to 200+ hosted models across 72 providers through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, picking models by prompt difficulty and rerouting on live cost-per-success, and serves open-weight models on your own GPUs. Inbound, it gates the crawlers, signed agents, and MCP clients that hit your APIs, with controls like Pay Per Crawl and Web Bot Auth. Both directions share one policy of virtual keys, budgets, and guardrails. Underneath sits a production-grade reverse proxy running auth, TLS, WAF, rate limiting, transforms, and caching. Single static binary, Apache License 2.0.

Can SBproxy serve models on my own GPUs?

Yes, on any GPU. A provider whose entire body is a serve: block boots to a first token: SBproxy resolves the weights, fits an engine and quantization to your card (bigger cards take FP8, smaller ones fall back to an int4 GGUF), runs vLLM or llama.cpp as a supervised subprocess, and routes to it. Run sbproxy doctor first and it reports what the host can serve. Every governance plane, meaning virtual keys, budgets, guardrails, and the usage ledger, applies to the local model unchanged, and a hosted provider placed after the local lane catches overflow under policy.

How is SBproxy different from vLLM or Ollama?

vLLM and Ollama serve a model. SBproxy stands up the environment around it: the governed OpenAI-compatible endpoint, virtual keys, budgets, guardrails on prompt and response, failover to hosted providers, and a verifiable usage ledger. It runs vLLM or llama.cpp underneath as supervised engines, so you keep the engine and gain the gateway.

How is SBproxy different from Cloudflare Pay Per Crawl?

Cloudflare runs at its own edge. SBproxy runs in your VPC, region, Kubernetes cluster, or air-gapped environment. Pricing is tier-aware, per route, per shape, and per agent rather than domain-wide. Inbound monetization, agent identity, content negotiation, and outbound AI governance live on one policy graph instead of separate Cloudflare products. Settlement supports both x402 and Stripe MPP, and you can act as your own Merchant of Record.

How is SBproxy different from other AI gateways like LiteLLM, Helicone, Portkey, or Kong AI Gateway?

Most AI gateways stop at routing calls to hosted providers. SBproxy also serves the weights: the same binary runs open models on your GPUs and applies the same keys, budgets, and guardrails to local and hosted traffic alike. It is also a real reverse proxy underneath, so auth, WAF, and rate limiting ride along instead of needing a second gateway. Helicone is excellent for LLM observability. LiteLLM is a Python library that grew a server, and sbproxy config import-litellm converts its config in an afternoon. Kong is a traditional API gateway with AI bolt-ons. None of them serve the model.

Where does SBproxy sit in my stack?

At the network hop between your apps or agents and the models they call, and between inbound AI traffic and your APIs. SDK gateways live inside one app's code, hosted edges govern from someone else's network, and agent platforms ask you to build on them; SBproxy is standalone infrastructure that deploys like nginx, works under any agent framework or platform, and fronts any hosted provider or your own GPUs. It terminates TLS with certificates it issues and renews from Let's Encrypt, so the governed endpoint can face the public internet behind virtual keys you mint and revoke at runtime.

How does SBproxy handle API keys and state across a fleet of instances?

SBproxy ships a dynamic key plane. Mint, rotate, and revoke virtual keys at runtime through the admin API with no reload, and a revoke takes effect on the next request. Keys are hashed at rest with HMAC-SHA256 and a server pepper, and upstream provider credentials are sealed with AES-256-GCM. Across a fleet of replicas, a built-in mesh keeps the keys, budgets, and per-key rate counters coherent using SWIM gossip and CRDT counters, so the cluster coordinates itself without an external Redis. LiteLLM and most AI gateways need a separate Redis to share that state across instances.

Where does SBproxy deploy?

Single binary on a server, Kubernetes operator on a fleet, or air-gapped install on a regulated network. Same policy graph in every shape. No phone-home. No SaaS edge. Bring your own Stripe, your own SSO, your own observability, and your own audit sink. Suitable for EU, India, Saudi Arabia, US public sector, defense, healthcare, and finance workloads with sovereignty requirements.

Is SBproxy open source?

SBproxy is open source under the Apache License 2.0. Free for any use, including production and commercial, with no field-of-use restriction. Read every line on GitHub. Verify every binary.

What is Pay Per Crawl and how does SBproxy support it?

Pay Per Crawl is the pattern of charging AI crawlers for access to content using HTTP 402 Payment Required. SBproxy ships the ai_crawl_control policy: AI crawlers that arrive without a valid payment token receive a 402 response with a JSON challenge. The crawler retries with the issued token and the proxy validates it through a pluggable ledger. Settlement supports x402 stablecoin and Stripe MPP. Tokens can be priced per route, per shape, and per agent.

What is Web Bot Auth and how does SBproxy verify AI agents?

Web Bot Auth is the IETF pattern for verifying signed AI crawlers and agents. SBproxy implements it through the bot_auth provider. Agents sign each request with an Ed25519 key under RFC 9421 HTTP Message Signatures and advertise their key id in the Signature-Input header. The gateway looks up the matching public key in its directory and verifies the signature. Agents that pass come through. Everything else gets 401.

Does SBproxy support MCP?

Yes. SBproxy ships an MCP gateway that federates internal tools under one identity model. Authentication supports OAuth2 with DPoP, PKCE, and DCR. Federated servers can be wrapped from any OpenAPI service, with per-server prefix and RBAC. The same policy graph that governs API and AI traffic also governs MCP tool invocations.

What does SBproxy replace?

A hosted model router (OpenRouter), an LLM proxy (LiteLLM, Portkey, Helicone), the hand-rolled shim in front of vLLM or Ollama, a traditional API gateway (Kong, nginx, Envoy), a guardrails service, a bot management product, and a payment rail for crawlers (TollBit, Skyfire). One runtime instead of six vendors stitched together, one policy plane instead of six control planes, one audit log instead of six disconnected feeds.

How many AI providers does SBproxy support?

SBproxy reaches 200+ models behind one OpenAI-compatible API through 72 native providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Groq, Mistral, Cohere, Together AI, Fireworks, xAI Grok, OpenRouter, Cerebras, NVIDIA NIM, Databricks, Snowflake Cortex, IBM watsonx, and Oracle GenAI, plus the models it serves itself on your GPUs via vLLM or llama.cpp and external self-hosted runtimes like Ollama and TGI. Routing supports fallback chains, weighted, round-robin, latency-based, cost-optimized, and outcome-aware strategies.

Is SBproxy safe to run in front of production traffic?

SBproxy ships as a single static Rust binary. Releases are cut from tagged commits in a public repository on GitHub. Dependencies are pinned and checksummed in Cargo.lock. The runtime does not fetch code from a public package registry when it starts. The deployment shape matches nginx, HAProxy, and Envoy. Hot reload is supported without dropping connections.

MCP and Agents

One gateway for tool-calling traffic (MCP) and agent-to-agent delegation (A2A), with the same auth and observability as everything else.

Overview

SBproxy speaks two protocols for agent traffic. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is for tool calling: an agent discovers and calls tools exposed by one or more upstream servers. A2A (Agent-to-Agent) is for delegation: one agent handing work to another. Both run through the same gateway as your HTTP and AI traffic, so the same auth, rate limiting, and observability apply without a separate stack.

MCP gateway: federate and govern tool calls

The mcp action federates one or more upstream MCP servers behind a single endpoint, namespacing tools and resources per upstream, and serves the standard JSON-RPC method set (initialize, tools/list, tools/call, resources/*, prompts/*).

Four things sit on top of the wire protocol:

Security. A tool description or tool output can read as an instruction to the model, not just data. Threat classes here include tool poisoning, definition tampering after approval, and credentials an agent should never hold.
Guardrails. Deterministic egress allowlisting, a lethal-trifecta session guardrail (private-data tools plus external-communication tools in one session gets denied), dual-LLM output quarantine, and stdio supervision.
Tool lifecycle. MCP has no native answer for publishing several versions of one tool and resolving the right version per consumer. SBproxy adds a rollout plane and a compatibility oracle that fails a version bump when a breaking change ships without a matching major version.
Admin over MCP. The gateway's own admin API is exposed as governed MCP tools, so an agent client like Claude Code or Cursor can check health or read config without a human holding the admin credential.

Initialize an MCP session against the admin API and confirm the notification handshake

A2A gateway: agent-to-agent delegation

The a2a action proxies JSON-RPC A2A traffic to an upstream, and the a2a policy enforces per-hop chain depth, cycle detection, and a callee allowlist. It pairs with MCP federation, one gateway serving both protocols.

The trust story matters more than the wire format here. An envelope claiming who is calling, who is being called, and how deep the delegation chain already runs is only as trustworthy as its source. A signed claim chain is verifiable; a plain header is only honored from a trusted proxy peer.

Agent Skills and content for agents

Agent Skills discovery is a different thing from tool calling: a /.well-known/agent-skills/index.json manifest a cooperative agent fetches to learn what an origin advertises before ever making a tool call.

Content shaping for agents covers a different direction of traffic entirely: an agent fetching your pages instead of calling your tools. Accept negotiation picks a body shape (Markdown, or a JSON envelope with a token estimate), and a Content-Signal header carries your per-origin editorial stance.

Who this is for

AI users wiring an agent framework to real tools start with the MCP wire shape, then security, before federating anything they do not control. Developers building an MCP or A2A integration lean on tool versioning and A2A's trust model to stop a breaking change or a spoofed envelope from reaching production. SRE leads operating this in production tune the session and egress guardrails per incident, and rate-limit by resolved agent identity instead of IP.

← PreviousSecure Any API Next →Pay Per Crawl