OpenRouter routes on its keys.
SBproxy routes on yours.
OpenRouter solved a real problem and solved it well. One account, one balance, and you can call a model you have no contract for, thirty seconds after you decide you want it. That convenience is worth paying for and plenty of teams should. The question is what happens when the workload stops being an experiment: every prompt still crosses infrastructure you do not run, and using your own provider keys costs you a percentage anyway.
- Stack
- Hosted SaaS, credit ledger in front of provider APIs
- Licence
- Closed source, hosted only
- Shape
- Model aggregator and billing layer
- Install
- Sign up, buy credits, change one base_url
Buy OpenRouter credits and they pay the provider. Bring your own key and OpenRouter still charges 5% of what the call would have cost on their platform, waived under 1M BYOK requests a month.
Your keys, your provider contracts, your negotiated rates. SBproxy is never in the money path and takes no percentage of anything.
Every request crosses OpenRouter’s infrastructure. Data policies let you restrict which providers you reach, not whether the traffic transits a third party.
Runs in your VPC, your region, or fully air-gapped. Prompts, embeddings, and guardrail classifiers stay on hardware you control. Nothing phones home.
Their site claims 400+ models across 70+ providers, reachable with no procurement. Genuinely the widest instant catalog available, and wider than ours.
72 native provider adapters, 200+ models, and the model field passes straight through so anything a provider ships works without waiting on us. You do need a key for each provider you use.
Outbound model calls. Not an API gateway, not an MCP gateway, and nothing for traffic arriving at your services.
One runtime for API, MCP, and AI traffic. TLS, WAF, auth, rate limits, and transforms in the same config as routing and budgets.
Routes to hosted providers only.
A serve: block resolves the weights, fits a quantization to the GPU you actually have, and supervises vLLM or llama.cpp under the same keys, budgets, and guardrails as any hosted model.
None. OpenRouter sits in front of the calls you make.
Also in front of the calls you receive: signed-agent verification over RFC 9421, metered crawlers with HTTP 402, MCP tools behind OAuth2.
You are moving fast, you want a model you have no contract for, and you would rather pay a convenience fee than manage provider relationships. For prototypes and small teams that is often the right call.
The traffic is production, the prompts are sensitive, procurement wants direct provider pricing, or you need the same gateway to cover your APIs and MCP tools instead of only your model calls.
- OpenRouter homepage, July 2026 (400+ models, 70+ providers)
- OpenRouter BYOK documentation: 5% fee, first 1M BYOK requests per month waived
- sbproxy docs/providers.md, 72 native adapters
Want to talk
before you install?
The gateway is on GitHub under Apache 2.0 and you can install it right now, so nothing here is gated behind a sales call. Use this form for deployment questions, migration scoping, or anything you would rather not file as a public issue.