compare / kong

Kong is mature.
Inbound monetization is missing.

Kong is the strongest traditional gateway in the open-source category. The AI features are real, well-engineered, and behind a paid tier. What Kong does not ship is inbound monetization, agent identity, or content negotiation. Plugin authoring is Lua. SBproxy ships all of it on one config.

summary
Stack
OpenResty / Lua
Licence
Apache 2.0 OSS, AI features paywalled in enterprise
Shape
API gateway with AI bolt-on
Install
docker, helm, paid Konnect SaaS
where the products diverge
AI feature licensing
Kong AI Gateway

AI plugins are part of Kong Enterprise. Per-traffic pricing, vendor commit, contract overhead.

sbproxy

The AI gateway is in the Apache 2.0 data plane. No plugin, no add-on, no per-traffic pricing.

Inbound monetization
Kong AI Gateway

None. Pay Per Crawl, x402, MPP, virtual keys are not in scope.

sbproxy

Pay Per Crawl with HTTP 402, x402 stablecoin, Stripe MPP, virtual keys, RSL licensing posture.

Agent identity
Kong AI Gateway

API keys and OAuth. No Web Bot Auth, no signed-agent verification.

sbproxy

Web Bot Auth via RFC 9421 message signatures. Ed25519 and HMAC. JWKS-shaped directory.

Plugin authoring
Kong AI Gateway

Lua. Effective once the team has it.

sbproxy

Most policies are declarative. CEL, Rego, Lua, JavaScript, and WASM available when you need to drop down, including an existing Rego policy set ported as-is.

When Kong AI Gateway wins

You have deep Kong investment already, you have Lua expertise, and budget for the enterprise tier.

When sbproxy wins

You want inbound monetization and agent identity on the same gateway, or you would rather not standardize on Lua.

sources
  • kong/kong repo and Kong Enterprise pricing page
  • Kong Konnect documentation
06 / talk to us

Want to talk
before you install?

The gateway is on GitHub under Apache 2.0 and you can install it right now, so nothing here is gated behind a sales call. Use this form for deployment questions, migration scoping, or anything you would rather not file as a public issue.

01
Share your stack. A few details on providers, scale, and the gateway you might be replacing.
02
Talk to engineering. A real conversation about whether SBproxy fits the deployment shape you have in mind. No demo theatre.
03
Get a straight answer. Including when the answer is that SBproxy is the wrong fit and you should run something else.